Eurovision post-mortem
Here are the facts. 41 countries failed to award the UK with a single point on Saturday. That doesn't mean the UK received no televotes in those 41 countries, however. As we know, all it means is that the UK song wasn't in the Top 10 most popular songs (out of the 25 performed in the final) in any of those countries. If *you* voted for the UK this year, chances are your vote meant nothing.
Most popular is key. I'm not going to comment *too* much about the quality of the songs because I have said time and time again that, with the advent of televoting and the demise of the jury, there is no such thing as a "best" song in this competition anymore. Eurovision is all about what people like and therefore arguing about the quality of the songs is completely missing the point.
Another fact is that the BBC has been a gargantuan and unflinching supporter of the Eurovision Song Contest over the years, both in terms of airtime and, most importantly, in £££s. It's not the reason why the BBC pledges so much cash, but you might know that this gives us "Big Four" status, which earns us a place directly in the final every year. I'm not sure if that's supposed to give us an advantage but, either way, it clearly doesn't. So, for what other reason should the BBC pledge as much as it does? Because the UK loves competing in Eurovision? Well does it, anymore? Frankly, I think the appeal has long since faded, but disappeared the instant every songwriter in the UK realised that... oh that's right... song quality stands for nothing in this contest.
I don't think anyone in the UK, including Terry Wogan, is complaining about not winning so it's not really sour grapes, per se. However, it's clearly obvious that the competition is not on an equal footing anymore. Some people say it *never* was but I don't see how that's an argument for doing nothing about it today.
So, what's the solution? Well, I am not sure there *is* one, really. All I know is that bloc voting only became really evident when the semi-final(s) arrived and, suddenly, all competing countries were allowed to vote in the final, regardless of whether or not they performed in the final. I also think it's time to stop *telling us* which country voted for which song, which is an exercise that only succeeds in drawing attention to voting bias that naturally and understandably exists in the world. Finally, let's make the winner Europe's decision and make every single vote count.
I started this post by saying that I wasn't at all surprised by the UK's placing in the contest - and that should be the EBU's biggest concern of all. Being able to predict its own ranking, year after year, is a would-be death knell for every competing country in Eurovision. Believe me, if the UK won it every year I'd get just as bored with the eventual outcome and I'd be complaining about it just as much as I am right now. After all, where's the fun in competing if you always know you're going to win, or always know you haven't got a hope?


























































